Which type of assessment aligns closely with specific curriculum goals?

The correct choice is a criterion-referenced test, as it is specifically designed to measure a student's performance against predetermined curriculum goals or criteria rather than comparing it to the performance of other students. In criterion-referenced assessments, the focus is on whether students can demonstrate mastery of specific skills or knowledge areas that are aligned with the curriculum. This approach provides clear information on how well a student has understood the material being taught and indicates areas where they may need additional support.

Unlike other types of assessments, criterion-referenced tests have set benchmarks or standards that are based on the intended outcomes of the instruction. For example, if a learning goal is for students to be able to perform a particular math operation, a criterion-referenced test would specifically assess that skill and indicate whether the student has met, exceeded, or fallen short of the expectations established by the curriculum. This alignment helps educators tailor instruction and interventions to meet students’ needs effectively.

In contrast, narrative assessments provide descriptive accounts of student learning and development, which might not directly correlate with specific curriculum goals. Summative assessments evaluate student learning at the end of an instructional unit and may not always align tightly with particular learning objectives since they usually encompass a broader range of content. Anecdotal records consist of teachers' observations